systematic evaluation of isoform function in literature reports of alternative splicing
- Classify distinct functions of isoforms
- Literature-based analysis of experimental evidence for functionally distinct splice isoforms (FDSIs) for over 700 human & mouse genes
- Result: fewer than 10% of genes have solid experimental evidences of FDSIs.
Main
![fig1](https://lijxug.github.io//2018/05/07/isoform-function-in-literature/fig1.png)
![fig2](https://lijxug.github.io//2018/05/07/isoform-function-in-literature/fig2.png)
![tbl1](https://lijxug.github.io//2018/05/07/isoform-function-in-literature/tbl1.png)
![tbl2](https://lijxug.github.io//2018/05/07/isoform-function-in-literature/tbl2.png)
![tbl3](https://lijxug.github.io//2018/05/07/isoform-function-in-literature/tbl3.png)
Some question
- Do most genes really have multiple functional isoforms?
- Given that only 3% of human and 9% of mouse genes have evidence for FDSIs
- Trying to link FDSIs back to sequence databases: 25/39
- Isoforms of 1/3 genes mentioned cannot be matched to transcripts in ENSEMBL
版权声明: 本博客所有文章除特别声明外,均采用CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 CN许可协议。转载请注明出处!